Print

Wikileaks of special interest on Burma/Myanmar

Note: Wikileak URLs (web-site addresses) are liable to change at short notice. "Rangoon" may be found under "Browse by origin" in the left column of any site listed, click on "R" and a choice of posts, including Rangoon, will appear. "Beijing" likewise by clicking on "B".

Bulk release of  Wikileaks on Myanmar
Wikileaks Website from 30 August 2011
As has already been reported by the media, Julian Assange has now released his entire archive of US official documents. From the US Embassy in Rangoon alone, a list on some 38 pages is now available, with some 50 cables on each page. The releases from Yangon/Rangoon are mostly dated 2002-2010, but there are on the first page a handful of cables going back to 1992.

Myanmar Briefing Note No.3 - 8 September 2011
Wikileaks - "An yll wynde that blowth no man to good, men say."

Here is our own selection, including one cable from Beijing, one from Bangkok and one from Chiang Mai: 

1992 - 2009 collection of US Embassy Rangoon cables
All are relevant: Note - the URL may change as more "R" sources are added.

US Embassy Beijing cables: see especially:
06BEIJING10909 - 07BEIJING1448 - 08BEIJING125 - 09BEIJING2868


Latest Wikileaks on Myanmar from London - 4 February 2011

1. 15 October 2007 - London: "Gordon Brown to issue letter to G7and IFIs on Burma"

2. 8 August 2008 - London: "UK doesn't expect strong new EU Burma sanctions"

3. 4 November 2008 - London: "HMG sees opportunity in Global Fund Application"

4. 12 January 2009 - London: "UK working with EU to improve Burma sanctions"

5. 6 June 2009 - London: "European Council (GAERC) and Burma/ Myanmar"

6. 10 December 2009 - London: "Burma: UK offers insight into EU position"

The latest Wikileaks on Burma/Myanmar, this time from the US Embassy in London reporting on discussions with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Comment is by Derek Tonkin.

Document 6 (the most recent) is possibly the most interesting. The FCO acknowledge that "the EU was struggling with its Burma policy"  and that "the very robust domestic UK lobby on Burma hamstrings much of what the Foreign Office can do because it presses UK politicians to maintain a strong, hard-edged line on Burma." The cable also confirms the known US stance that "the regime needs to make progress before sanctions should be reassessed."

Comment: By "making progress" the US means political reform. But this will only happen as and when the regime decides - because the entire Western sanctions regime makes no significant impact. This highlights the continuing impasse and the general malaise of current Western policy.  Indeed, Western policy is based on the myth that in present conditions the military regime might respond. They won't. So why continue with policies which are bound to fail?

Document 1 is worthy of note because it reveals PM Gordon Brown interested in seeking to use economic measures to promote democracy. This is however interpreted by the US Embassy as "opening a discussion of economic inducements" which Gordon Brown thinks might push Myanmar towards democracy.

Comment: This is a fallacy. It was tried before - in action stemming from the Chilston Park Conference in 1998 - See Page 87

The request to the US Embassy for information about the effectiveness of the Jade Act would have been met later in the year when the US Government Accounting Office produced in September 2009 a pretty devastating report on the general ineffectiveness of the Jade Act:

Document 4 shows that it was the British Embassy in Rangoon which compiled (from Myanmar Yellow Pages) the original list of 1,207 enterprises targeted in the February 2008 sanctions, not because of their affiliations with State, military or crony interests but because they were in targeted sectors of the economy, including furniture and jewellery. That is, not targeted, but generalised sanctions.

Comment: So we now know whom to blame for the inclusion of e.g. the eight silversmiths of Pakokku and numerous pro-democracy supporters, simply because they happened to be in yellowpages.biz rather than in  yellowpages.com or yellow pages.net. The UK Embassy in Rangoon were indeed "trying to cull this list down".

Document 2 identifies the hawks and the doves on sanctions in the EU. The hawks include the UK, Sweden, Finland, Czech Republic, Netherlands and Ireland. The doves include Germany, Austria, Italy and Portugal. Italy and Portugal are said to be "philosophically" reluctant that sanctions can have an impact.

Comment: I would counter that everyone  - including the hawks - knows full well that sanctions have been a failure, and even worse - counterproductive to EU interests. But this again highlights the EU dilemma, that their interests in Burma/Myanmar have been subordinated to their principles, which ought to concern the Coalition Government in the UK. In order to maintain the illusion, it becomes vitally important that no study on the effectiveness of sanctions should ever be released.

France is said to be "constrained primarily by their Total investments".  The Total investment should however be a general EU concern because Asian companies are hovering like hawks to pick up the Total assets for a song. Do we really want the Chinese to take them over? And do we relish blackouts in Bangkok and industrial zones adding to Thailand's political problems? Even highly critical NGOs like EarthRights International now accept that Total should stay in Myanmar, since their replacement could lead to a deterioration in human rights.

I recognise that both the US and UK administrations struggle under the pressures of domestic political imperatives to give shape and meaning to controversial ministerial and congressional demands over Burma/Myanmar. When however US Assistant Secretary Kurt Campbell recently told reporters that:  "Several Southeast Asian nations have come out saying it's time to lift sanctions. We have stated very clearly we think that that is obviously premature", many might feel that it was not so "obvious" to anyone anymore.


"Aftenposten"  Wikileaks published on 4 February 2011

26.08.2003: Burmese General Khin Nyunt as Prime Minister
 

20.10.2004: Tougher guys move up in Rangoon 

14.02.2005: The SPDC's economic priorities 

22.05.2006: UN U/SG Gambari's visit surpasses expectations

16.10.2007: Burma: Track II process trashed 

25.10.2007: Aung San Suu Kyi meets with regime liaison 

28.11.2007: Burma: the dialogue is dead

30.04.2008: Ambassador presses rig on Burma 

08.05.2008: Burma: Than Shwe is the problem 

11.06.2008: Burma: struggles at the top affecting relief effort 

10.04.2009: Burma-KNU: KNU seeks preconditions for talks


Wikileaks published "The Hindu" (India) in March 2011

14 November 2033: Indian Vice-President's visit to Burma

11 February 2004: India encourages democracy in Burma

30 March 2005: FM Natwar Singh's visit to Burma

15 December 2005: India joins ASEAN's tougher line on Burma

20 February 2007: India's current Burma policy presented

11 July 2007: India silent on arms sale ban

12 May 2008: FM Nyan Win's conversation with Pranab Mukherjee 


Miscellaeous Wikileak articles by Simon Roughneen

1.  Cables reveal US, Canada in sync on Burma - 3 May 2011

2.  Burmese regime 'stiffened' at democracy talk - 19 July 2011

3.  Cables show US sought Cambodian role in Burma - 21 July 2011 

 
London
Yangon








peter-popham.jpg
om4.jpg






            Nat's Wife



043a.jpg